About Me
Copyright Scott Hartman. Powered by Blogger.
My Blog List
-
Il theropode del 2013!1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Autumn Refuge3 months ago
-
Happy Squirrel Appreciation Day!4 months ago
-
United in Los Angeles8 months ago
-
Vaccines = Good!1 year ago
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Tails of Woe
1:54 PM
| Posted by
Scott Hartman
Welcome back! This will be a shorter article that continues the concern for tails that we established in the inaugural T. rex tail post a couple weeks ago. There is an all too common error that artists make when they attempt to impart a sense of to dynamic motion to their dinosaurs - and in particular to the dromaeosaurs. They flex the tail up at the base so sharply that it would break the tail...if not break the pelvis!
We'll figure out how to avoid this gruesome mistake after the break...
Labels:theropods | 6
comments
Saturday, March 26, 2011
A History of Skeletal Drawings: Part 3 - Dino Renaissance to the present
3:00 PM
| Posted by
Scott Hartman
We saw in Part 2 that the modern convention of skeletal illustration had largely been invented by the 1950s. Alas, it didn’t immediately catch on like wildfire, and in other ways the 1950s represents a nadir in terms of published skeletals. Yet starting in the 1960s would see steady progress up to the modern era. How did it all happen? Let’s take a look!
Labels:Skeletal drawing topics | 14
comments
Sunday, March 20, 2011
A History of Skeletal Drawings: Part 2 - Bone Wars to the 1950's
7:12 PM
| Posted by
Scott Hartman
As we saw in Part 1, the 19th century saw the rise of many of the modern conventions we see in skeletal reconstructions. Yet the last two decades of the century closed without any innovations, and at times a retreat from proportional accuracy. In short, skeletal reconstructions became more schematic in nature. Yet the creation of the modern silhouette skeletal reconstruction evolved in the first half of the 20th century. Why did skeletal drawings see an initial fall? And when did the modern form get invented? Let’s take a look...
Labels:Skeletal drawing topics | 7
comments
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
A History of Skeletal Drawings: Part 1 (pre-20th century)
12:32 PM
| Posted by
Scott Hartman
The ponderous creature you see above is Plateosaurus. The skeletal reconstruction could probably be several posts in itself, but first I’d like to spend some time pondering how we got here. No, no, I don’t mean what link you clicked on to reach my blog, but rather the larger journey taken by scientists and the scientific illustrators that collaborate with them. We're going to spend lots of time dissecting modern skeletal reconstructions and laying out the do’s and don’ts of restoring extinct animals, but first it’s worth reviewing how we arrived at this juncture...
Labels:Skeletal drawing topics | 9
comments
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
T. rex: "Baby got back"
11:15 PM
| Posted by
Scott Hartman
A few months ago Scott Persons and Phil Currie published a paper that clarified the shape of the tail of T. rex. It's a paper I'm fond of, in part because I did a reconstruction for it. No, I'm not going to post it here; it's already staring at you from the banner of this blog.
In the paper, Persons and Currie did some comparative anatomical sleuthing to better understand the size and shape of the caudofemoralis muscle in tyrannosaurs. For those of you who aren't familiar with the caudofemoralis muscle, it runs down much of the tail and inserts on the femur; when the muscle contracts, it pulls the leg back. This makes it a Very Important Muscle (TM). If you are adventurous (or just happen to live in Louisiana) it's worth noting that if you eat alligator meat, this is the part you usually end up eating.
Their paper demonstrated that many scientists and paleoartists have been underestimating the size of the caudofemoralis by a wide margin. As a result artists were reconstructing the tail incorrectly. Here for example is an Allosaurus (drawn by some yahoo) that has a tail that is too skinny.
In the paper, Persons and Currie did some comparative anatomical sleuthing to better understand the size and shape of the caudofemoralis muscle in tyrannosaurs. For those of you who aren't familiar with the caudofemoralis muscle, it runs down much of the tail and inserts on the femur; when the muscle contracts, it pulls the leg back. This makes it a Very Important Muscle (TM). If you are adventurous (or just happen to live in Louisiana) it's worth noting that if you eat alligator meat, this is the part you usually end up eating.
Their paper demonstrated that many scientists and paleoartists have been underestimating the size of the caudofemoralis by a wide margin. As a result artists were reconstructing the tail incorrectly. Here for example is an Allosaurus (drawn by some yahoo) that has a tail that is too skinny.
Labels:theropods | 7
comments
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Welcome to the official Skeletal Drawing.com Blog!
10:50 AM
| Posted by
Scott Hartman
For the first installment, let's get the the five W's out of the way:
Who: For those of you who don't know me, my name is Scott Hartman. You can read more about my research, interests, and other exploits here.
What: This blog will deal with the functional anatomy of dinosaurs and other extinct critters. In addition to exploring what is known about the anatomy and appearance of extinct animals, an emphasis will be given as to how we know, as well as the limits on what can be confidently restored in extinct animals.
Why: Blogging turns to be the perfect medium for recurring articles on a similar theme. Almost like they were designed that way. Also, all the cool kids seem to be blogging these days, and no one wants to be last to the party!
Where: I hope to integrate the blog even more seamlessly with my website and other content, but for now it's available directly at: http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.com/, or indirectly from my website: www.skeletaldrawing.com/.
How (often): You can expect to see frequent updates. At least weekly, but perhaps more often as topics and schedule allow.
And now, for a skeletal reconstruction:
![]() |
That's Silesaurus opolensis, an "almost dinosaur" from Poland. I'll probably have more to say about it (and why it appears to not quite count as a dinosaur) in a future post, but in the meantime if you're interested you can read a bit more about it at the Silesaurus entry on Wikipedia , which is pretty decent.
The format of the blog is not set in stone, so I welcome your suggestions and feedback!
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)






